The RIAI standard forms govern a large share of serious Irish building projects — and they are genuinely good contracts, with machinery for most of what goes wrong. The catch: the machinery only protects parties who operate it. RIAI disputes are procedural chess as much as construction argument, and the player who knows the form wins exchanges the other never sees.
The Architect at the Centre
The forms place the architect in a dual role: the employer’s designer, but also contract administrator — issuing instructions, valuing and certifying, determining extension claims — and required to act fairly between the parties in the certifying functions. Many “builder versus employer” disputes are structurally disputes about this role: the certificate not issued, the extension refused, the instruction disputed. Where the architect’s own performance is the problem, the claim changes character entirely: professional negligence.
The Recurring Battlegrounds
- Certification: under-certification, non-certification, and payment consequences — with the statutory adjudication regime now running alongside the certificate machinery on contracts within the 2013 Act;
- Variations: what was instructed, by whom, in what form, at what value — won by parties whose instruction paperwork matches the contract’s requirements;
- Time: extension of time claims and liquidated damages — a notice-driven machinery that punishes late and vague claims;
- Defects and practical completion: when completion was actually achieved, and what the defects liability period requires of each side.
The Dispute Route: Conciliation, Then Arbitration
RIAI forms typically channel disputes through conciliation and, failing resolution, arbitration under the contract’s clause — and the courts hold parties to it, staying proceedings issued in breach. Conciliation deserves respect rather than box-ticking: run properly, with the case genuinely prepared, it resolves a substantial share of disputes at a fraction of arbitration’s cost — and preparation for it is never wasted, because it is the arbitration case in draft. The strategic comparison: arbitration vs court.
The Real-Time Rule
Every RIAI dispute file tells you when it was really decided: months earlier, in notices served or missed, certificates challenged or ignored, records kept or not. The parties who take advice mid-project — quietly, on the machinery — arrive at final account with the file already winning. The pre-signature version of the same discipline: contracts review.
An RIAI Project Heading for Dispute?
Certificates, notices, conciliation strategy - the machinery rewards the prepared. Call while the file is still being written.
Call 01 5827148Related Reading
About the Author
Richard O’Shea, Solicitor practises with Mary Molloy Solicitors (established 1981), advising homeowners, self-builders, subcontractors and SME contractors across Ireland on building disputes, defects claims and payment recovery. Richard holds a Diploma in Mediation from the Law Society of Ireland — central to construction work, where conciliation and mediation resolve many disputes without a courtroom. Contact Richard on 01 5827148 or richardoshea@marymolloysolicitors.com.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Every farm and family situation is different, and you should obtain advice on your own circumstances before acting. In contentious business, a solicitor may not calculate fees or other charges as a percentage or proportion of any award or settlement.